Board not bound by strict rules of procedure; stenographic notes of oral proceedings; record of charges and evidence. Applicability; deviations from provisions. Notice; denial of request.
However, the computer-generated images presented in games, movies, and other media are detached from our physical surroundings. This is both a virtue—everything becomes possible—and Scope and limitation on computer limitation.
The limitation comes from the main interest we have in our daily life, which is not directed toward some virtual world, but rather toward the real world surrounding us. Smartphones and other mobile devices provide access to a vast amount of information, anytime and anywhere.
However, this information is generally disconnected from the real world.
Consumers with an interest in retrieving online information from and about the real world, or linking up online information with the real world, must do so individually and indirectly, which, in turn, requires constant cognitive effort.
In many ways, enhancing mobile computing so that the association with the real world happens automatically seems an attractive proposition. Location-based services can provide personal navigation based on the Global Positioning System GPSwhile barcode scanners can help identify books in a library or products in a supermarket.
These approaches require explicit actions by the user, however, and are rather coarse grained. Barcodes are useful for identifying books, but not for naming mountain peaks during a hiking trip; likewise, they cannot help in identifying tiny parts of a watch being repaired, let alone anatomic structures during surgery.
Augmented reality holds the promise of creating direct, automatic, and actionable links between the physical world and electronic information.
It provides a simple and immediate user interface to an electronically enhanced physical world. The immense potential of augmented reality as a paradigm-shifting user interface metaphor becomes apparent when we review the most recent few milestones in human—computer interaction: The trajectory of this series of milestones is clear: First, there was an immense increase in access to online information, leading to a massive audience of information consumers.
These consumers were subsequently enabled to also act as information producers and communicate with one another, and finally were given the means to manage their communications from anywhere, in any situation.
That is, the model was stuck in a world of abstract web pages and services without directly involving the physical world. A lot of technological advancement has occurred in the field of location-based computing and services, which is sometimes referred to as situated computing.
Even so, the user interfaces to location-based services remain predominantly rooted in desktop- app- and web-based usage paradigms.
Augmented reality can change this situation, and, in doing so, redefine information browsing and authoring. Augmented reality can overlay computer-generated information on views of the real world, amplifying human perception and cognition in remarkable new ways.
After providing a working definition of augmented reality, we will briefly review important developments in the history of the research field, and then present examples from various application areas, showcasing the power of this physical user interface metaphor.
Definition and Scope Whereas virtual reality VR places a user inside a completely computer-generated environment, augmented reality AR aims to present information that is directly registered to the physical environment.
AR goes beyond mobile computing in that it bridges the gap between virtual world and real world, both spatially and cognitively. Achieving this connection is a grand goal—one that draws upon knowledge from many areas of computer science, yet can lead to misconceptions about what AR really is.
For example, many people associate the visual combination of virtual and real elements with the special effects in movies such as Jurassic Park and Avatar. While the computer graphics techniques used in movies may be applicable to AR as well, movies lack one crucial aspect of AR—interactivity.
To avoid such confusion, we need to set a scope for the topics discussed in this book. In other words, we need to answer a key question: The most widely accepted definition of AR was proposed by Azuma in his survey paper.
According to Azuma , AR must have the following three characteristics: Combines real and virtual Interactive in real time Registered in 3D This definition does not require a specific output device, such as a head-mounted display HMDnor does it limit AR to visual media.
Audio, haptics, and even olfactory or gustatory AR are included in its scope, even though they may be difficult to realize. Note that the definition does require real-time control and spatial registration, meaning precise real-time alignment of corresponding virtual and real information.
This mandate implies that the user of an AR display can at least exercise some sort of interactive viewpoint control, and the computer-generated augmentations in the display will remain registered to the referenced objects in the environment.
While opinions on what qualifies as real-time performance may vary depending on the individual and on the task or application, interactivity implies that the human—computer interface operates in a tightly coupled feedback loop.
The user continuously navigates the AR scene and controls the AR experience. It registers the pose in the real world with the virtual content, and then presents to the user a situated visualization a visualization that is registered to objects in the real world.
We can see that a complete AR system requires at least three components: A fourth component—a spatial model i. The virtual-world model consists of the content used for the augmentation. Both parts of the spatial model must be registered in the same coordinate system.
A borescope (occasionally called a boroscope, though this spelling is nonstandard) is an optical device consisting of a rigid or flexible tube with an eyepiece on one end, an objective lens on the other linked together by a relay optical system in between.
The optical system in some instances is surrounded by optical fibers used for illumination of the remote object. In re Hyatt, F.2d , , USPQ , (Fed.
Cir. ) (A single means claim which covered every conceivable means for achieving the stated purpose was held nonenabling for the scope of the claim because the specification disclosed at most only those means known to the inventor.).
Scope of part. (a) This part— (1) Defines words and terms that are frequently used in the FAR; (2) Provides cross-references to other definitions in the FAR of the same word or term; and.
Nicholas R. Mattingly is an associate at Mattingly & Malur, timberdesignmag.com focuses on patent prosecution and patent portfolio development for startups and large companies, both foreign and domestic. The Cumulative List of organizations (CL) described in Internal Revenue Code of (IRC) (c), CL, commonly known as Publication 78, is a computer generated listing of names of organizations.